<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO BLOG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>search engine optimisation &#38; marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>In Praise of Nominet</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=118</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=118#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My opinion of most online resources is generally low &#8211; and usually a post by me is a pop at some incompetent fool &#8211; but today I choose to sing the praises of Nominet.
From time to time I have had to deal with clients who get themselves into all sorts of scrapes with their online [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion of most online resources is generally low &#8211; and usually a post by me is a pop at some incompetent fool &#8211; but today I choose to sing the praises of Nominet.</p>
<p>From time to time I have had to deal with clients who get themselves into all sorts of scrapes with their online adventures &#8211; things like expired domains, domains in dispute, other Nominet tag holders going on the missing list, etc, etc.</p>
<p>In the past 15 years I have had dealings with some of the great websites of the world, including Google, the BBC, various domain name registrars and hosting companies, but none of these can hold a light to the quality of customer service provided by Nominet.</p>
<p>Like many of my clients, I am no source of all knowledge on the web, I struggle sometimes with IP problems, DNS issues, etc &#8211; but when it comes to .co.uk domain names I look upon it with great pleasure knowing that I can sort it easily with the help of the staff at Nominet.</p>
<p>No question is too silly, no problem too hard to sort for these consummate experts. They are a real pleasure to deal with and have never given me anything but the best information, advice and hands-on help.</p>
<p>If only the other large organisations and companies had a tenth of the expertise and efficiency as the customer-facing staff at Nominet, the internet would be a much better place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=118</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google &amp; Verizon Carving Up The Web?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=114</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=114#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what&#8217;s this all about?
&#8220;The internet giants Google and Verizon are reportedly close to a deal that could bring an end to &#8220;net neutrality&#8221;, allowing the telecoms company to prioritise the order and speed in which it delivers content to users.&#8221;
&#8220;Speaking at the Mobile World Congress in February this year, Eric Schmidt, Google chairman and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s this all about?</p>
<p>&#8220;The internet giants Google and Verizon are reportedly close to a deal that could bring an end to &#8220;net neutrality&#8221;, allowing the telecoms company to prioritise the order and speed in which it delivers content to users.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Speaking at the Mobile World Congress in February this year, Eric Schmidt, Google chairman and chief executive, appeared to rule out the prospect of paying for priority access to consumers.&#8221;</p>
<p>So why the about-face?</p>
<p>It is wrong that big business should be able to control over the Internet &#8211; end of story!</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/aug/05/google-verizon-net-neutrality" target="_blank">Full story here</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=114</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google &#8211; Good to go &#8211; and stay in China</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=111</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=111#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite very strained relations, the Chinese government have renewed Google&#8217;s licence to operate in China.
Although I support Google&#8217;s stance re censorship and human rights, I must admit to feeling glad that these two are still holding hands.
Read the full story here
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite very strained relations, the Chinese government have renewed Google&#8217;s licence to operate in China.</p>
<p>Although I support Google&#8217;s stance re censorship and human rights, I must admit to feeling glad that these two are still holding hands.</p>
<p>Read the full story <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jul/09/google-china-licence-renewal" target="_blank"><strong>here</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=111</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Google Interface</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=108</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=108#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never one to complain about Google in the past, I must admit to hating the new Google home page.
The beauty of Google was always its simplicity &#8211; with the option to search sites from the UK when performing the initial search. Now one has to make a worldwide search just to get the option to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never one to complain about Google in the past, I must admit to hating the new Google home page.</p>
<p>The beauty of Google was always its simplicity &#8211; with the option to search sites from the UK when performing the initial search. Now one has to make a worldwide search just to get the option to search the UK only &#8211; from the leaders of online technology, how crap is that?</p>
<p><span id="more-108"></span>And what about the option to customise the home page? If I wanted pretty pictures and/or news/videos etc, I would use Bing or go straight to a portal Like MSN or Yahoo.</p>
<p>This really is the thin end of the wedge &#8211; how long before Google buries itself in a plethora of add-on gimmicks.</p>
<p>Just give me fast, simple search without all the messing about thank you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=108</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do I love thee? Let me count the ways.</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=104</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=104#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/apr/20/google-google-street-view
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/apr/20/google-google-street-view" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/apr/20/google-google-street-view</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=104</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Quits China</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=91</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=91#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have nothing but admiration for Google when I read this morning that they have pulled out of China and will be online from Hong Kong. Too many western companies turn a blind eye to China&#8217;s human rights record so as not to jeopardise their profits &#8211; and that is a disgrace.
It is a brave [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have nothing but admiration for <a title="Google Quits China" href="http://www.google.com/" target="_blank">Google</a> when I read this morning that they have pulled out of China and will be online from Hong Kong. Too many western companies turn a blind eye to China&#8217;s human rights record so as not to jeopardise their profits &#8211; and that is a disgrace.</p>
<p>It is a brave and noble thing that Google refused to censor their search results for a corrupt government that represses it&#8217;s own people and victimises any dissention.</p>
<p>No doubt China will try and hit back at Google, but at least when you type in Tiananmen Square 1989 you get the truth.</p>
<p>Full story <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/mar/23/google-china-censorship-hong-kong" target="_blank"><strong>here</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=91</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Name Rip-Off?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=86</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=86#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suspicious happenings at my domain name supplier &#8211; I registered four domain names on December 20th &#8211; two of which were very important, the two others were bought &#8220;just in case&#8221;. I received confirmation and an invoice, but when I went to upload a new site a few days later I found that the the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suspicious happenings at my domain name supplier &#8211; I registered four domain names on December 20th &#8211; two of which were very important, the two others were bought &#8220;just in case&#8221;. I received confirmation and an invoice, but when I went to upload a new site a few days later I found that the the two important ones were not in my control panel. A quick whois found them registered to another person the day after I registered them. I rang the company and they offered to refund my money&#8230; Funnily enough the two other names were correctly registered.</p>
<p>The real coincidence? The person who has my two names lives in Japan but had registered them through the same UK based company.</p>
<p>Watch this space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=86</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rupert Murdock Threatens to Block Google</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=84</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=84#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha ha ha ha ha
Do it Rupert &#8211; go on, you know you want to&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha ha ha ha</p>
<p>Do it Rupert &#8211; go on, you know you want to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=84</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rupert Murdoch plans charge for news websites</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=81</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=81#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch plans to charge for all news websites by next summer, according to an article in today&#8217;s Guardian.
To say I&#8217;m dissappointed is a bit of an understatement &#8211; but nevertheless it goes to show how a certain mentality never quite grasped the Internet.
I, for one, won&#8217;t be giving any dosh to Murdock &#8211; and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rupert Murdoch plans to charge for all news websites by next summer, according to an article in today&#8217;s Guardian.</p>
<p>To say I&#8217;m dissappointed is a bit of an understatement &#8211; but nevertheless it goes to show how a certain mentality never quite grasped the Internet.</p>
<p>I, for one, won&#8217;t be giving any dosh to Murdock &#8211; and I hope lots of others will do the same. Basically what we are seeing is an old dinosaur finally admitting defeat through lack of creative thinking.</p>
<p>Loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=81</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft &amp; Yahoo Finally Get It On</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=78</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=78#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just read in the San Francisco Chronicle that, after many false starts, Microsoft and Yahoo have finally struck a deal to pool their expertise on search.
Taking on Google was never going to be easy, but the combined power of the second and third largest forces on the search market might actually stand a chance.
I hope [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read in the San Francisco Chronicle that, after many false starts, Microsoft and Yahoo have finally struck a deal to pool their expertise on search.</p>
<p>Taking on Google was never going to be easy, but the combined power of the second and third largest forces on the search market might actually stand a chance.</p>
<p>I hope it works &#8211; the market needs a shake up.</p>
<p>This from the SFC website:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Under the terms of the 10-year deal, which will require regulatory approval, Microsoft&#8217;s Bing search tool will become the exclusive platform on Yahoo&#8217;s sites, funneling an enormous volume of queries through the Redmond, Wash., software titan&#8217;s increasingly popular algorithm. Yahoo of Sunnyvale will sell the lucrative advertising tied to online search for both companies.</em></p>
<p><em>Microsoft will pay Yahoo for the traffic it generates, at a rate of 88 percent of search revenue for the first five years. Within two years of securing approval, Yahoo estimates the agreement will add $500 million to its operating income and save $200 million in capital expenditures.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/07/29/BU73190UAS.DTL&amp;tsp=1" target="_blank"><strong>Click here to read more</strong></a><em><br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineserious.co.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=78</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
